by talbot » Fri Dec 13, 2013 2:56 am
I shouldn’t have gotten involved in this thread. Now I can’t stop thinking about the design issues of two batteries below deck. A couple of things that make my schematic more colorful than useful:
1. Two batteries sideways will sit very high in the bilge because of where their outer edges will contact the sloping sides of the hull. You may not need double boxes. You could still cut and then reattach the lower half of the boxes if you wanted the self-leveling effect.
2. That tray under the boxes is much more important with two batteries. For me, it just serves as a passive restraint the keep the battery box from moving fore and aft and eventually cracking the floor around the lip. The weight of the battery is on the reinforcing pads, and the box is flimsy—maybe three layers of light fabric molded around the base of the battery box. Your tray would bridge the deep part of the keel and would have to support the weight of the inside edges of the batteries. I would consider using one double battery box with a continuous floor.
3. Two boxes or a double box set sideways to avoid the under-floor stringer will create a low wall across the middle half of the cuddy. It will be harder to slip heavy objects like a camping duffle into the cabin or to retrieve bulky objects that are forward of the mast.
4. If you put the batteries side by side with their long axes aligned with the keel to save space, you will have to take out a pretty big section of the stringer. I found the hardest part of the whole job was repairing the damage I did to the floor support. In fact, I never got it right. This winter, with the boat upside down in the garage, I’m cutting away some of my old crappy work and replacing it. The cuddy floor is really wimpy, and you wouldn’t want it to break under you while you’re in there doing the wiring.
5. If you can put additional support into the floor, it might be able to take more of the weight. After my battery box was precisely aligned, my last step before installation was to put D-section marine weather stripping around the underside of the lip. When the box is empty, its base actually clears the tray because the box is floating on the gasket between the lip and floor. When the battery is aboard, the foam is compressed, but some of the weight is still distributed between the floor and hull. Even with the reinforced hull, it creeps me out to think of 50 lbs of lead bearing on such a small area. That part of the hull is already notorious for stress failures.
6. I didn’t mention this, but the lip is bolted directly to the floor. You obviously can’t reach inside to thread nuts once the box fills the opening, so I installed permanent T-nuts under the floor, fiberglassed in place.
As to Greenlake's question about reinforcement: On the DS II, the keelson begins just forward of the mast. But in any case, the tray is the flat support surface. It gets those two extra layers underneath because all the battery weight is ultimately transmitted to the hull through its two outside edges. The main hull reinforcement was initiated by the battery project, but I was also aware (from Roger's book and from reports on the forum), that the area forward of the CB trunk is prone to cracks caused by stresses from the CB. So I was happy to reinforce it. Once the floor is open, that's the easiest part of the whole job.