So, about this downhaul...

Moderator: GreenLake

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby jeadstx » Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:42 pm

Sorry for the confusion Tim, although I know where the boom is supposed to be when the sail is raised, I don't want to lock it at that point. When my dad taught me to sail many many years ago, he taught me to raise the main, then push down the boom and cleat the downhaul to tighten the luff. When I raise the sail, if the boom doesn't rise with it, I check for the slide jamming. One thing different on my DS II is that I have a DS I mast. Although all the tangs for the stays are in the right places, I've read somewhere that my mast may be a little taller, don't really know as I haven't measured it.

Yes, my cleat is at the very bottom of the mast right next to the hinge plate. I sometimes wonder if the P.O. put some epoxy on the screws. I've tried several times to break it free. If I feel like it at some point, I'll just get an aluminum tube and put another cleat on. Cleat location just hasn't caused me any real problem.

Thanks for the tip on the Elmer's stuff.

I noticed recently that my boom gooseneck slide has some slight damage. Ordered a new one from D&R, haven't installed it yet.

John
1976 Day Sailer II, #8075 - Completed the 2011, 2012, and 2013 Texas 200
1952 Beetle Boat Swan Catboat
Early Rhodes 19
1973 Mariner 2+2, #2607 - Completed 2014, 2015 and 2016 Texas 200
1969 Day Sailer I, #3229
Fleet 135; Canyon Lake, Texas
jeadstx
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby TIM WEBB » Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:57 pm

No worries John: I realize everyone has different setups/proceedures/etc. I'm just all about reduction of effort where at all possible ... ;-P

There is one other consideration to the whole main all the way up/boom height discussion: I originally did the rig on the ground exercise because I had a new main that was an unknown variable. I wanted to see exactly where the boom would be with the main raised as far as possible, using only the main halyard to tension the luff. Turned out the boom needed to be quite low, due to the combination of things I described in a previous post. However, had I found that I could set the gooseneck stop higher, and still achieve the desired luff tension, I would probably still have elected to keep it rather low, in order to reduce the (very small I know) heeling lever moment of a higher main on the rig. Turned out that was not the case, but was one of the things I wanted to find out by doing the exercise in the first place ...
Tim Webb
1979 DS2 10099 The Red Witch
(I used to be Her "staff", in the way dogs have owners and cats have staff, but alas no longer ... <pout>)
TIM WEBB
 
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: RIVERSIDE, CA

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby jeadstx » Mon Aug 10, 2015 11:37 am

I was just on Facebook and saw the pictures of the latest Cape Cod Shipbuilding Day Sailer. I noticed that the boom appears to be fixed on the mast at one height, no boom downhaul.

John
1976 Day Sailer II, #8075 - Completed the 2011, 2012, and 2013 Texas 200
1952 Beetle Boat Swan Catboat
Early Rhodes 19
1973 Mariner 2+2, #2607 - Completed 2014, 2015 and 2016 Texas 200
1969 Day Sailer I, #3229
Fleet 135; Canyon Lake, Texas
jeadstx
 
Posts: 1216
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dripping Springs, Tx

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby TIM WEBB » Mon Aug 10, 2015 9:59 pm

Yup, that's definitely a fixed gooseneck!

I guess when you buy brand new you kinda expect everything to fit ... ;-P

I think that from CCSB it will, since Wendy mentions "test stepping/outfitting". I believe that is something they do with every new boat they build, whether it's for a show or a buyer.
Tim Webb
1979 DS2 10099 The Red Witch
(I used to be Her "staff", in the way dogs have owners and cats have staff, but alas no longer ... <pout>)
TIM WEBB
 
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: RIVERSIDE, CA

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby GreenLake » Tue Aug 11, 2015 5:14 am

TIM WEBB wrote:Yup, that's definitely a fixed gooseneck!

I guess when you buy brand new you kinda expect everything to fit ... ;-P

I think that from CCSB it will, since Wendy mentions "test stepping/outfitting". I believe that is something they do with every new boat they build, whether it's for a show or a buyer.


Only as long as you never replace your sails...
~ green ~ lake ~ ~
GreenLake
 
Posts: 7146
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:54 am

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby Interim » Tue Aug 11, 2015 12:02 pm

To John's point about a lubricant, I use SailKote.

It works very well, but I will admit I used this as a solution that didn't require it. I was in fact encumbering my boom too much by leaving it pre-tied from the gooseneck to the cleat. Fixing that operator error let my sail go up to where it should be (obviously). However, the lubricant certainly made the boltrope slide much easier.

--john
1979 DSII
Interim
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:40 am
Location: Nebraska

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby TIM WEBB » Tue Aug 11, 2015 10:50 pm

John, how exactly did cleating down your boom/gooseneck encumber raising the main?
Tim Webb
1979 DS2 10099 The Red Witch
(I used to be Her "staff", in the way dogs have owners and cats have staff, but alas no longer ... <pout>)
TIM WEBB
 
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: RIVERSIDE, CA

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby GreenLake » Wed Aug 12, 2015 2:48 am

We'll let John give us his version, but in my case I know that I'm putting my whole weight (well shoulder and up) into lowering the boom. If I had that tied down, I'd have to overcome this in raising the sail. I'm glad I don't have to do both at once.
~ green ~ lake ~ ~
GreenLake
 
Posts: 7146
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:54 am

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby Interim » Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:19 am

I had the tack pulled down too far. And sometimes I've tried hoisting the sail with the main sheet cleated too tight (this is because when I'm launching, I have the main sheeted pretty close so the boom isn't flopping all over). Either, in my case, have held the tack too low to get the head to the top of the mast.

--john
1979 DSII
Interim
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:40 am
Location: Nebraska

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby TIM WEBB » Wed Aug 12, 2015 7:49 pm

Which brings me back to my original point: if you have determined at what height the gooseneck needs to be in order to have a fully raised main with a tight luff, why not just set the DH cleat at that position and be done with it, and not have to fuss with the DH at all when raising the main?
Tim Webb
1979 DS2 10099 The Red Witch
(I used to be Her "staff", in the way dogs have owners and cats have staff, but alas no longer ... <pout>)
TIM WEBB
 
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: RIVERSIDE, CA

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby GreenLake » Wed Aug 12, 2015 8:24 pm

@Tim
because there appears to be not insignificant tension on the sail when the boom is in the correct position. Yes, you may be able to supply that tension via the halyard, but I find it easier to add it after I've cleated off the halyard by leaning into the sail and bringing down the boom. Gravity, you know.
~ green ~ lake ~ ~
GreenLake
 
Posts: 7146
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:54 am

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby TIM WEBB » Wed Aug 12, 2015 11:40 pm

And that is why in my ground exercise I set the gooseneck DH cleat an inch or two lower, just to make sure ... ;-P

Hasn't failed me yet GL!
Tim Webb
1979 DS2 10099 The Red Witch
(I used to be Her "staff", in the way dogs have owners and cats have staff, but alas no longer ... <pout>)
TIM WEBB
 
Posts: 1208
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: RIVERSIDE, CA

Re: So, about this downhaul...

Postby K.C. Walker » Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:22 pm

Another not insignificant reason to set your boom height with the down haul tube is to set the gooseneck height as a fulcrum for the vang. You don't want the vang to increase luff tension when applied. That is what the Cunningham is for. Most of the racing boats have gone to a fixed gooseneck rather than a sliding one. I don't believe that I've heard complaints about not being able to get a full haul on the main.
KC Walker, DS 1 #7002
K.C. Walker
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:50 pm
Location: North Stonington, Connecticut

Previous

Return to Rigging

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

cron