by GreenLake » Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:05 pm
Gary,
I think this is a very useful discussion to have, so let me contribute a bit from my point of view.
I got my DS because it was offered for sale, seemed to fit my ideas of what boat I was looking for, and the price was right - in that order. I had never heard of a Daysailer before, and it was only after I had sailed a bit that I became interested in finding out more about it.
That's when I found out about this website - a long time before my first post, by the way. I checked out the information about the association right away, but soon realized it was organzied into "fleets" and that none of them seemed to be in my area. The member application also asked for a boat name and sail number. The first I don't have, and the second I wasn't sure about - in fact, it took years of following the discussions on this forum to understand this issue.
The focus of the organization (as described in the bylaws) as well as the benefits offered, appear clearly focused on the interests of people engaged in one-design racing. Notwithstanding the motivaltional quote on the membership application. This forum seems to be the exception. It's definitely a benefit to the general (non-racing) Daysailer community, and, as you have noticed, that part of the commnunity has responded enthusiastically.
Any forum lives off the community that comes together around the forum, whether they are frequent or occasional contributors. I'm not surprised by the fact that some of the more frequent contributors are not members of a DS fleet - not having the same chance to get together with other DS sailers in person makes a forum even more valuable. At the same time, the open nature of the forum prevents if from going stale.
Having an active and open forum would seem to provide a benefit to the claas association in return. Many first-time posters that use the forum learn about the fact that there is a class association and that there are design modifcations that are not class-legal and what that means. For some, like the recent poster from Italy, this doesn't have practical consequences, but I recall several others that wrote of their decision to retain an option on racing their DS at a later stage. I would find it surprising if the forum does not also contribute as a recruiting tool, directly or indirectly.
You ask very specifically why non-member contributors to the forum "do not support the efforts of the association". Let me make clear at the ouset that I would not have hesitated to make a donation explicitly in support of this forum, and would encourage others to so so as well, if they can't or won't join as DSA members. I find it a resource and activity well worth supporting (and not solely by posting here).
However, I always hesitate to join any association the aims of which appear to coincide only very tangentially with my own. Like K.C., I had considered joining in the past, but hesitated because I see little chance of becoming interested in any racing-related activities. A focused reminder/recruitment drive on the forum would have gotten me to act sooner.
Perhaps my take on the work of the asscociation is based on a misunderstanding on my part. I do note from the US Sailing One Design class survey that 66% of DSA members are supposedly non-racers - a very high percentage (for the Laser, that figure is 5%). There's also a the quote that's part of the membership application, it talks about the DS in much broader terms than the bylaws do. If there are significant activities of the DSA that benefit the apparent majority of non-racing members, perhaps you should make them part of your membership drive - just as NPR does.
In the meantime, I've sent off a check, hoping that this will contribute to maintaining this site and maintaining it as an open forum. I'd like to encourage others to do the same, whether or not it is "required" as condition to participate in the forum. I personally think an open forum is more valuable than a roped-off sandbox for members and stand by that position.
I hope that you find these observations helpful.
~ green ~ lake ~ ~